{"id":439,"date":"2020-01-28T23:19:07","date_gmt":"2020-01-28T22:19:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cccm.iem.at\/?page_id=439"},"modified":"2020-01-29T14:24:01","modified_gmt":"2020-01-29T13:24:01","slug":"snippet-1-4-upload","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/cccm.iem.at\/snippet-1-4-upload\/","title":{"rendered":"snippet 1-4 upload"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Here you can upload your branch snippet which should have a duration of 30 to 50 seconds. You can upload sib, musx, pdf, jpeg, png, jpg, or gif files. Please include your sibelius or finale files if available and do not mention your name in the score.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
selected reflection<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Meso-structure: Considering the select snippet from outside, as it were \u2014 as a general appraisal of any music \u2014 I am glad that the selected snippet brought some variety (not contrast) to the texture, as well as some space, allowing for thiner textures and soloistic behavior. In regard to our original concept of devations\/morphing, however, I fear we are getting each time more distant. The treatment of the material in this last segment is basically motivic \u2014 which could itself be considered a form of divergence and morphing, but then we are only playing with words. I feel we need more gradual, long processes. Perhaps a way forward would be to treat the \u201cthinning\u201d to one line as a morphological aspect. We could now progress to a gradual administration of density of voices \u2014 work with two lines, then three, back to two, then suddenly make a metamorphosis back into tutti. All of this without any new material. The next score should somehow look like the ones we have already seen. Only then, I feel, would we be ready for some new contrast, which could very well be the \u201chardcore repetitive structures emerging out of nowhere\u201d.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Deadline for submission is on Thursday 30.1.2020 at 23:59 in your local time-zone.<\/p>\n\n\n\n <\/p> <\/ul><\/div>\n